JUSTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF AN EFFECTIVE MODEL OF BUREAUCRACY IN THE CONDITIONS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2023/17-6/7Keywords:
effective model of bureaucracy, M. Weber, public administration, Public Service, digital bureaucracy, democratizationAbstract
The relevance of this article lies in the need to conduct a study of the institution of bureaucracy, as well as to find and establish an effective model of bureaucracy, which in turn will contribute to the democratization of Ukraine and the solution of the problems that exist in the bureaucracy system at the moment. The purpose of the study is to analyze the features of the bureaucracy, determine its purpose and expediency, and in connection with that, develop an effective and efficient model of the bureaucracy. The following methods were used in this article: dialectical method, historical and hermeneutic methods, formal-legal method, institutional method, logical method, method of induction and deduction, method of modeling and system analysis, axiomatic method and others. The results of the study are the definition of the main concepts and terms, namely: "bureaucracy" and other terms and concepts that were used within the scope of this study; clarification of the essence and purpose of the institution of bureaucracy; establishing the stages and history of the development of the institution of bureaucracy in the world in general, and in Ukraine in particular; analysis of existing models of bureaucracy in the world and clarification of their features; researching the system of bureaucracy in Ukraine and establishing the model of bureaucracy that is used in Ukraine; identification of problems characteristic of the institution of bureaucracy in Ukraine and research and establishment of means and processes that are necessary for improving the mechanisms of state administration in Ukraine. The provisions laid down in this article are of practical value, first of all, for state bodies and authorized persons, whose powers include the provision of services in various spheres of life, and whose functions include the improvement of the civil service institute. Also, this study will be interesting for people who apply to state bodies or officials with the issue of solving problems in various spheres of social life.
References
Batrymenko, O. (2018). Transformation of the Soviet model of bureaucracy in post-socialist Ukraine. Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko. 6. https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Batrymenko_Oleh/ Transformatsiia_radianskoi_modeli_biurokratii_v_postsotsialistychnii_Ukraini.pdf
Bozhko, P. (2019). Models and concepts of modernization of public administration. VisnykHNUnameiV. N. Karazina, "Issues of Political Science" series, vol. 35. 28-36. https://periodicals.karazin.ua/politology/ article/view/14332/13487
Demchenko, L. (2019). Criticism of the theory and practice of bureaucracy. Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko. Public Administration Aspects 7 (5). 5-11. https://aspects.org.ua/index.php/ journal/article/download/596/579
Dzioba, T. (2021). Digital bureaucracy contributes to strengthening the country's economy and minimizing corruption. Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine. https://minagro.gov.ua/news/cifrova-byurokratiya- spriyaye-zmicnennyu-ekonomiki-krayini-ta-minimizaciyi-korupciyi-taras-dzoba
Draft Law of Ukraine "On Administrative Procedure". (2022). Document 2073-IX. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2073-20#Text
Law of Ukraine "On Civil Service". (2016). Vedomosti Verkhovna Rada (VVR), No. 4. 43. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/889-19#Text
Kaganovska, T. (2019). The influence of bureaucracy on the organization of management activities: a historical and legal analysis. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University named after V. N. Karazin. "PRAVO" series. No. 28. 11-18. https://periodicals.karazin.ua/law/article/view/14687/14013
Perepelitsa, N. (2020). Bureaucracy in the system of modern democracy in the concept of F. Fukuyama. Dissertation. Kyiv National University named after T. Shevchenko. Kyiv. 210. https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/ Perepelytsia_Nataliia/Biurokratiia_v_systemi_suchasnoi_demokratii_v_kont septsii_F_Fukuiamy.pdf?PHPSESSID=3eq0o957rg4t47ccuqq8afdpt6
Soldatenko, O. (2020). Basic concepts of civil service development. PUET. 97-102. http://dspace.puet.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/10470/1/% D0%9D.%20%D0%A1.%20%D0%86%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE.pdf
Bertrand, M, R Burgess, A Chawla, G Xu (2020), "The Glittering Prizes: Career Incentives and Bureaucrat Performance", The Review of Economic Studies 87(2): 626–655. https://academic.oup.com/restud/article- abstract/87/2/626/5498709
Draper, Hal. (1977). Karl Marx's Theory of Revolution, Vol. 1: State and Bureaucracy. Monthly Review Press; Revised ed. Edition. 272. https://monthlyreview.org/product/karl_marxs_theory_of_revolution_vol_i/
Fedosov, V., Payentko, T. (2016). Ukrainian bureaucracy: conceptual principles and peculiarities of functioning. "Securities Market of Ukraine" magazine. No. 9-10. 14. http://securities.usmdi.org/PDF/1031.pdf
Fritz Sager and Christian Rosser. (2021). Weberian Bureaucracy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0 001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-166;jsessionid=4B175A239789D82F95299 D30E62A2588
Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century (Messenger Lectures). Cornell University Press. 160. https://www.amazon.com/State-Building-Governance-World-Order-Century/ dp/0801442923
Gulzar, S, and B J Pasquale (2017), "Politicians, Bureaucrats, and Development: Evidence from India", American Political Science Review 111(1): 162–183. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/cupapsrev/v_ 3a111_3ay_3a2017_3ai_3a01_3ap_3a162-183_5f00.htm
JeneI, GyörGy. (2021). The Impact of the Theory of Max Weber on Bureaucracy to our Present Day. Journal of Economic Literature. Civic Review· VOL. 17. Special Issue. 218-240. http://real.mtak.hu/144409/1/psz_ 2021_17_eng_16.pdf
Kapisa, T. (2021). Types of bureaucracy. Guide for students. https://www.zambianguardian.com/types-of-bureaucracy/
Nagel, M., Peters, B.G. (2021), "Identity and Representation: Representative Bureaucracy in the European Union", Machin, A. and Meidert, N. (Ed.) Political Identification in Europe: Community in Crisis?, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 161-178. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/978-1-83982-124-020211016
Payenkto, T., Fedosov, V. (2016). Theories and concepts of the development of bureaucracy: a retrospective analysis. Securities market of Ukraine. No. 9–10. 17–31. https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/handle/2010/21247?show= full&locale-attribute=uk
Ravishankar, N. (2009). The Cost of Ruling: Anti-Incumbency in Elections. Economic and Political Weekly 44(10). 92-98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261891054_The_Cost_of_Ruling_ Anti-Incumbency_in_Elections
Rogger, D. (2018). Publication: The Consequences of Political Interference in Bureaucratic Decision Making. Policy Research Working Paper. Public Disclosure Authorized. 47. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/ server/api/core/bitstreams/d2281854-5b3f-54c3-90c4-c99852d865c7/content
Scot, А. (2021). Bureaucracy: advantages and disadvantages. Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Global Journal of Sociology and Authropology. №11 (2). 1. https://www.internationalscholarsjournals.com/articles/bureaucracy- advantages-and-disadvantages.pdf
Stojanovski, S., Denkova, J., Trajkov, P. (2014). Weber's models of bureaucracy in the age of globalization. Center for Legal and Political Research, Faculty of Law, Goce Delcev University, Shtip, Republic of Macedonia. First international scientific conference: social change in the global world, Shtip. 873-882. https://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/11852/2/20.Strashko%20 Stojanovski%2C%20Jadranka%20Denkova%2C%20Petar%20Trajkov.pdf
Thijs, N., Hammerschmid, G., Palaric, E. (2017). A comparative overview ofpublic administrationcharacteristics andperformance in EU28. Social Europe. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 108. https://ec.europa.eu/ social/BlobServlet?docId=19208&langId=en
Varzar, P. (2010). Democracy and bureaucracy: compatibility issue. Forms of political power. Political management. No. 1. 76-87. https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/varzar_demokratiia.pdf
Vashchuk, V. (2020). Bureaucracy as a source of state modernization: prospects, challenges, conflicts. Master's thesis. National Technical University Kyiv Polytechnic Institute named after Ihor Sikorskyi. 102. https://ela.kpi.ua/bitstream/123456789/38318/1/Vashchuk_V_magistr.pdf
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society : an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press. 639. https://archive.org/ details/economysociety00webe/page/6/mode/2up
Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. University of California Libraries. 322. https://archive.org/details/ protestantethics00webe
Wilson, W. (1887). The Study of Administration. The Academy of Political Science. Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 2, No. 2, 197-222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2139277#metadata_info_tab_contents
ISSN 
ISSN 
