Theoretical bases of research of influence of organizational culture on administrative efficiency
Keywords:methodology, public administration, organizational culture, administrative efficiency, competitiveness
The impact of organizational culture on administrative efficiency is a little-studied scientific problem in the field of public administration in Ukraine. Although public administration is being reformed in Ukraine, little attention is being paid to this problem. However, scholars pay attention to the culture of the organization as an economic phenomenon. Various aspects of organizational culture as a transcultural phenomenon are considered. The authors note that organizations in the economic sector quickly took an active position in the use of organizational culture. Organizational culture is studied as an important factor in forming and increasing the competitiveness of enterprises due to the possibility of influencing administrative efficiency. The public sector views administrative efficiency differently: as a social platform for employed citizens. As a result, numerous problems of low administrative efficiency of public sector organizations, unreasonable huge costs, and losses are a burden on the public budget. As a result, inefficient use of public finances delays the socio-economic development of society.
This paper discusses the possible causes of this situation. First, cultural management practices in public sector organizations in such societies are deeply rooted in a traditional management culture that has a strong bureaucratic basis. Administrative efficiency is seen not as a result but as a process. Secondly, in the field of science of public administration and administration, the scientific and methodological support of the study of administrative efficiency is insufficiently developed. The authors argue that the study, conceptualization, and operationalization of the impact of organizational culture on administrative efficiency in the context of socio-economic development of a developing country or region is an important scientific problem in public administration (for example, Ukraine, Iraqi Kurdistan). Thus, this study is aimed at developing theoretical and methodological support for the study of assessing the direct and indirect effects of organizational culture on organizational activities and administrative efficiency in the public sector. The example of Ukraine and Iraqi Kurdistan are two different traditions of organizational culture with a common problem of low administrative efficiency. The authors propose research that covers the descriptive design of a methodology for studying the impact of organizational culture on administrative efficiency: first, the analysis of the concept of administrative efficiency, and secondly, the analysis of the concept of organizational culture in relation to administrative efficiency.
Methodology: analysis and synthesis when considering strategies, programs, ratings of public sector organizations, in particular, ministries, departments, local governments, which allow analyzing the main directions of reform activities and scientific support of research on the impact of organizational culture on administrative efficiency; methods of systematization and comparison, which were used in determining the nature and features of the impact of organizational culture on administrative efficiency.
It is emphasized that such research will provide a deeper understanding of organizational culture and its relationship to administrative efficiency in the public sector. This will have a positive impact on the development of strategies and policies for governance reform and socio-economic development in developing countries and regions.
Alam, I. (2013). Customer interaction in service innovation: Evidence from India. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 8(1).
Carr A. (2000). Critical Theory and the Management of Change in Organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13 (3).
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
De Weaver M. (2016). Kurdistan’s Great Recession: From Boom to Bust in the Rentier Economy. Sulaimani: Institute of Regional and International Studies, American University of Iraq, Sulaimani.
Goodnow Frank Johnson. (1900). Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. New York: The Macmillan company; London: Macmillan & co., ltd.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1), 8.
Joseph, J.& Sümer, F. (2019). Public Sector Reforms in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq: Tackling the Socially Constructed Barriers to Change. In: Anaid A., Tugdar E. (eds) Iraqi Kurdistan’s Statehood Aspirations. Middle East Today. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Quinn, R., & Cameron, K. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Schein, Edgar H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership.
Sułkowski, Ł. (2009). The problems of epistemology of corporate culture. Journal of Intercultural Management, 1(1).
Sułkowski, Ł. (2012). Elements of Organizational Culture – theoretical and methodological problems. Management. Vol.16, No. 2.
The Kurdistan region of Iraq-Reforming the economy for shared prosperity and protecting the vulnerable: Executive summary (English) (2016). Washington, D. C.
Wei L., Liu J. & Herndon N.C. (2011). SHRM and Product Innovation: Testing the moderating effects of organizational culture and structure in Chinese Firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22 (1).
Wilson W. (1887). The Study of Administration. Source: Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 2. 197–222.
World Bank Group. (2016). Kurdistan Region of Iraq–Reforming the Economy for Shared Prosperity and Protecting the Vulnerable. Washington DC: World Bank.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Zheng W., Y & B. & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking Organizational Culture, Structure, Strategy, and Оrganizational Effectiveness: Mediating Role of Knowledge Management. Journal of Business Research, 63.
Belous V. (2017). Efficiency of public authorities. Ukraine.
Weber M. (1998). Sociology. General historical analyzes. Policy. Ukraine.
Encyclopedic Dictionary of Public Administration (2010). Part 1: A – G. Ukraine.
Efficiency of public administration (2002). Ukraine.
Zubchyk O. (2018). The concept of "competitiveness" in the study of administrative efficiency of public administration. Theory and practice of public administration. № 2.
Osborne D. (2001). Governance without bureaucrats: Five strategies for state renewal. Moscow.
Prikhodchenko L. (2009). Efficiency of public authorities: tools and factors of evaluation. Collection of sciences. Ukraine.
On approval of the Concept for the introduction of positions of reform specialists (2015). Government portal. Ukraine.
Wright G. (1994). Governance. Annual Report of the National Agency of Ukraine for Civil Service for 2018 (2019). Kyiv. 48 p.
Tkachova O. (2013). Effectiveness of public administration: concepts and approaches to evaluation. Bulletin of the National acad. state gov. under the President of Ukraine. № 2.
White L. (2003). Introduction to the science of public administration. L. D. White; classics of the theory of public administration: the American school. Moscow.
Fomin V. (2011). Theoretical approaches to the interpretation of the concept of "efficiency of public administration". Public administration: improvement and development. № 11. Ukraine.
Shulga I.L. (2016). Political and managerial relations in the system of public administration: tendencies, concepts, improvement. Ukraine.